9/11: UNDERSTANDING THE DARKWORKERS' GAME

by
Allisone Heartsong
© 13 September 2001 In God We Trust

Photos Courtesy of CNN, Time, and  Jon Anhold

Comparable in shock value to the surprise attack against Pearl Harbor on 7 December 1941 and the coup d'etat assassination of President Kennedy on 22 November 1963, this seeming act of vengeance constitutes another classic example of the deadly power game that darkworkers have long been playing on Planet Earth, which is now at pivotal point.

To understand this power game, we must make a clear distinction between three different groups of people: 1) the CONTROLLERS, including the Rothchilds in Europe, the Jesuit General in Rome, the Hanoverian Windsors in England, the Rockefellers in America, and their political agents such as Adam Weishaupt, Henry Kissinger, George Bush I, and George Bush II; 2) the INTIMIDATORS, including the IRS, the FBI, and the CIA in the United States and the military intelligence organizations and secret terrorist organizations throughout the world, all of which operate, directly or indirectly, in the service of the controllers; and 3) the REACTORS, including all those who react to the various provocations by the intimidators with fear, anger, grievance, vengeance, and a demand to be protected by the controllers, to whom they are only too willing to give away their freedom and their sovereign power in return for deceptive promises of peace and security.

This vicious game, which is essentially the global version of a Mafia extortioner's protection racket, has been played over and over again ever since it was perfected by Julius Caesar over two thousand years ago during his conquest of Gaul around 57 BC (see endnote #2).  First, it was used to create the Roman Empire. Then, it was used to transmogrify the Roman Catholic Church. And now it is being used to create what George Bush I likes to call "the New World Order", which is actually nothing more than a globalization of the Old World Order (see endnote #3).

A careful analysis of relevant articles published by the Council on Foreign Relations in Foreign Affairs will show that the controllers have been covertly pursuing a provocative strategy of divide and conquer against Islamic nations for the past fifty years. What is more, it will reveal that this insidious strategy has been covertly designed to exploit the religious conflict between Christians and Muslims which can be traced all the way back to an inflammatory speech by Pope Urban II, who, at the Council of Clermont in 1095, maliciously instigated the Crusades for political purposes.

During the past century, this elite group of master manipulators has gradually gained control of the entire planet by first instigating a series of world wars, in which they financed both sides of the conflicts, and then using their fraudulent money system based on taxation, usury, and debt to bankrupt virtually every nation in the world, including the United States of America. As a consequence, the United Nations is now an organization of bankrupt nations whose political leaders are all forced to take orders from the international bankers who control them.

It is therefore no exaggeration to say that, during this past century, a conspiracy of darkworkers has intentionally transformed what used to be called the American dream into an American nightmare. Whereas America was once regarded as the hope of the world, the Vietnam War and the Persian Gulf War have been used by the global elite to transform it into a hated symbol of oppression.

The simple solution to this challenging problem may be found in an age-old proverb which warns: "When your dream turns into a nightmare, that means it's time to wake up." Thus, the question now is whether We the People are going to wake up from our brainwashed and mind-controlled state of somnambulistic enslavement or whether we are going to allow ourselves to be tricked yet again into giving our sovereign power away to those who would enslave and destroy us in the name of protecting us.

Fortunately, those of us who have declined to play the darkworkers' game realize that there is something else going on at the present time, from which the current terrorist attack is designed to divert our attention. Although the vast majority of people are not yet aware of it, the reality is that a bright new world of enlightened consciousness is even now in the process of being born at the very same time that the old world of unenlightened consciousness is dying of corruption and decadence.

We have now arrived at the pivotal point of this dying and birthing process on Planet Earth. These are indeed the times that try men's souls; and during the next few years, it will become increasingly clear to everyone that we have reached what may be called the dividing of the ways. Whereas those lightworkers who have chosen to acknowledge and align to the source of their being will have an essentially harmonious experience participating in the birthing of this bright new world of enlightened consciousness, those darkworkers who have chosen not to acknowledge or align to the source of their being will have an increasingly discordant experience participating in the dying of the old unenlightened world as we have known it, which is now in the terminal stage of its corruption and decadence.

Therefore, in deciding how we are going to respond to the current terrorist attack of 11 September 2001 and the vicious cycle of ruthless retaliations which will surely follow, let us bear in mind that how we experience the events in our lives is determined, not so much by what happens, as by how we choose to respond to what happens.

Furthermore, let us realize that how we choose to respond to this particular happening will inevitably reveal what kind of world we are choosing to create for ourselves. Are we going to choose the negative path of the warrior who reacts to one destructive act of hatred with another destructive act of hatred? Or are we going to choose the positive path of the harmonizer who knows how to embrace and transmute discord into harmony?

As Mahatma Gandhi pointed out many years ago, if we pursue the punitive policy of "an eye for an eye," we will soon find ourselves living in a world where everyone is blind.

Having arrived at this pivotal point in the history of Planet Earth, we now find ourselves suddenly confronted with what can best be described as humanity's final examination prior to graduation. To anyone who is awake and aware, it will be painfully obvious that, while some of us are going to pass this test, many are going to fail.

It is all a matter of choice. Whereas those of us who are enlightened will choose to respond with compassion and unconditional forgiving love, those of us who are unenlightened will choose to react with fear, anger, grievance, and vengeance, thereby continuing to play the darkworkers' game by giving our sovereign power away and sacrificing our freedom in return for the protection that we are demanding from those who are trying to control us.

As these words are being written on 13 September 2001, President George Bush II is following predictably in the footsteps of his notorious father by carefully waiting until the controlled media and their public opinion polls have manipulated the American people and their elected representatives to unite patriotically behind their Commander in Chief for the specific purpose of demanding that the United States Government take decisive retaliatory action, not only against the terrorists themselves, but also against all those who harbor them. Thus it is that the first war of the twenty-first century has now begun as an all-out "crusade against terrorists" which, simply by expanding the definition of that term to include all freedom fighters and all dissenters who dare to question the so-called "New World Order," could all too easily turn into another worldwide witch-hunt like the Inquisition of the Roman Catholic Church, which began around 1200 AD and lasted for almost five centuries.

The truth of the matter is that, when We the People give our sovereign power away to political agents of the global elite such as George Bush I and George Bush II, we are unwittingly inviting disaster. Only time will tell which presidential election was more disastrous (not only for the American people, but for the entire world): the orchestrated election of George Bush I in 1988 or the orchestrated election of George Bush II in the year 2000. It all depends on whether George Bush II chooses to wake up from his personal nightmare.

In any case, let us be very clear about the fact that, whereas the apparent target of their formally declared "war against terrorism" has now shifted from the vilified President of Iraq, Saddam Hussein, to the highly-publicized, CIA-trained terrorist leader, Osama bin Laden, the actual target consists in our freedom, as exemplified by the Constitution for the United States of America, which was specifically designed by our Founding Fathers to guarantee our inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Thus, the moral of this story is: Do not be deceived by appearances.

These photographs of Osama bin Laden are genuine except the last one.

ENDNOTE #1: By Archangel Gabriel

According to Archangel Gabriel through his dedicated full-body channel Karen Cook, 9/11 was an inside job perpetrated by the Dark Illuminati, using American demolition experts (deceptively labeled "Al Qaeda") under the command of their CIA-trained agent Osama bin Laden, who was deliberately set up and provoked by the U.S. military presence in Saudi Arabia, which was quietly withdrawn by Bush immediately after 9/11.
 

ENDNOTE #2: Caesar's Formula: 

"Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword.  It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind.  And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry.  Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded with patriotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader, and gladly so.  How do I know?  For this is what I have done.  And I am Caesar."

                    -- Julius Caesar on Patriotism

ENDNOTE #3: Bush's Formula:

"The first thing the Bush Administration said was, 'we're going to go out and make new friends in this world.'  No, we're not.  That was a lie.

"We're going to make new enemies as a precursor to increase global tension, which in turn is a precursor to turn back the clock to a world that we understand.  A world where the old cabal works: a world where it is the waste, fraud, abuse, graft, corruption, and malfeasance of yesterday that the Bushonian faction of the military-industrial complex understands.  It is a world where things can remain hidden under 'National Security' . . .

"It's really very simple.  In order to hide behind the National Security Act, the United States must have an enemy."

- Al Martin The Case For Sedition

ADDENDUM (2001)

In essence, the psychopathic global elite have first stolen the federal government of the United States from the American people, next stolen the federal government of Israel from the Jewish people, and then transformed those two governments into malevolent instruments of what Muslims call "The Great Satan" for the purpose of wreaking havoc throughout the world in an all-out attempt to enslave humanity through the imposition of a totalitarian New World Order.

ADDENDUM (2002)

Although the federal government of the United States was first subverted by passage of the unconstitutional Federal Reserve Act in 1913 and then bankrupted by passage of the unconstitutional Emergency Banking Act of 1933, it continued to maintain the semblance of being a constitutional republic until the fraudulent and unconstitutional election of George Bush II in the year 2000.

In November of 2000, George Bush II took the first step toward transforming the United States of America from a constitutional republic into a fascist police state by arranging to have himself elected President by his father's cronies on the Supreme Court rather than by the American people.

In October of 2001, George Bush II took the second step by using the CIA-orchestrated terrorist attack of 11 September 2001 as a pretext for signing the unconstitutional USA PATRIOT Act, which explicitly violates key provisions of our Constitution in the name of national security, and then signing an executive order authorizing secret military trials and executions in the name of national security.

In July of 2002, George Bush II took the third step by initiating a citizen spy program, using a toll-free hotline called Operation TIPS (Terrorism Information and Prevention System), comparable to the citizen informant program employed by the communist government of East Germany during the Cold War.  In the guise of enlisting patriotic American citizens in its fraudulent war against the very terrorism which it has long been sponsoring through the CIA, our illegitimate federal government is now attempting to divide and conquer the American people by redefining what it means to be a good American.  Whereas our Founding Fathers defined good Americans to be those who take a united stand against governmental tyranny and governmental terrorism, George Bush II defines good Americans to be those who unwittingly support governmental tyranny and governmental terrorism by spying and snitching on their fellow citizens.

In the meantime, Stanley G. Hilton, a San Francisco attorney (SBN # 65990) filed a lawsuit in United States District Court, Northern District of California, on 3 June 2002 alleging that George W. Bush ordered the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001.

ADDENDUM (2003)

For a comprehensive exposé of the Dark Illuminati endgame, which provides overwhelming evidence that the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001 were an inside job designed to deceive, intimidate, and manipulate the American people into giving their power away to an illegitimate government which is seeking to enslave them in the guise of protecting them, see the brilliant video, "9/11: The Great Illusion", which may be obtained by sending $13 to George Humphrey, P.O. Box 5772, Austin, TX 78763.

ADDENDUM (2004)

It is the job of darkworkers to practice deception by telling lies, and it is the job of lightworkers to expose those lies by revealing the truth.

In the April 2004 issue of his courageous newsletter, From the Wilderness, former LAPD detective Michael Ruppert has demonstrated conclusively that the Bush Administration, as represented by the public testimony of National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice on 8 April 2004, is lying about not having advance knowledge regarding the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001.

In that same issue, Dr. Jamey Hecht has also demonstrated that the book Against All Enemies by US intelligence expert Richard Clarke strongly suggests, without actually saying so, that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were an inside job in the form of a "false flag" operation.

In September of 2004, Michael Ruppert announced the release of his new book, Crossing The Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil, in which he implicates Richard Cheney as the primary organizer of the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2004.

For another comprehensive exposé of the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001, revealed to be an inside job by the global elite, see the video The Great Conspiracy: The 9/11 News Special You Never Saw composed by Barrie Zwicker, a Canadian media critic. For an exposé of the 9/11 cover-up by the controlled media, see the video "911: In Plane Site" by Dave vonKleist.

For a brilliant, comprehensive, and absolutely devastating exposé of the Bush Administration as a fascist conspiracy by the neo-cons, see HIGHJACKING CATASTROPHE: 9/11, FEAR, AND THE SELLING OF AMERICAN EMPIRE (2004); written, directed and produced by Sut Jhally and Jeremy Earp for the Media Education Foundation; narrated by Julian Bond; featuring interviews with 28 prominent political experts.

William Rodriguez, the maintenance worker who was in the basement of the North Tower of the World Trade Center on the morning of 11 September 2001 and who rescued many people, has testified publicly and repeatedly regarding the explosions in the basement, which he witnessed and which clearly indicates a controlled demolition.

Dr. Steven E. Jones, a professor of archeometry at Brigham Young University, published in November of 2005 a preliminary draft of what eventually evolved into a 52-page paper which hypothesized that the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7 was caused by controlled demolition using thermite in prepositioned cutter-charges, the clear implication being that  nine-eleven was an inside job.

Subsequent investigation by Professor Jones has now confirmed this hypothesis with conclusive scientific proof.

Scientific Analysis Proves Towers Brought Down By Incendiaries
Steven Jones' analysis on WTC steel about to be released

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | June 20 2006

Scientific analysis on WTC steel debris undertaken by BYU Professor Steven Jones proves that the twin towers were demolished by means of incendiary devices and the release of the conclusive evidence is imminent.

The material that was first brought into question on the back of photos and video clips of the twin towers showing a dripping molten substance and floating white ash can now be confirmed as being thermate, combining thermite which is used as an incendiary device to bring down structures and sulfur, which cuts through steel quicker and leaves a yellow residue.

Pools of molten yellow metal were also found underneath both towers and Building 7 subsequent to the collapses.

"The evidence points directly to controlled demolition which means an inside job brought these World Trade Center buildings down," Jones told radio host Alex Jones in a video interview.

Jones says that, "using advanced techniques we're finding out what's in these samples - we're finding iron, sulphur, potassium and manganese - these are characteristic of a variation of thermite which is used to cut through steel very rapidly, it's called thermate."

"In order to have thermite in these buildings in this way, to help bring the buildings down, that means that thermite had to be planted in the buildings which of course implies directly and inside job - someone had to have access into the buildings," said Jones.

Jones' has conducted over 40 peer reviewed scientific studies two of which were published in Nature and Scientific American.

Prison Planet.tv members can click here to watch a clip of Professor Jones explaining his findings. Subscribe by clicking here.

This facet of the 9/11 truth movement was first brought to light during a November 2005 appearance on The Alex Jones Show by Brigham Young University physicist Professor Steven Jones. Jones said that white phosphorous wasn't powerful enough to cause the implosion but that thermite was the likely culprit. Alex Jones's 2005 release Martial Law 9/11 Rise of the Police State highlighted the physical evidence that the towers and Building 7 were brought down with incendiary devices.

Jones stated that thermite was a "clever" choice because its ingredients, aluminum and iron oxide do not require identifying tags by law, meaning they couldn't be traced back to their manufacturers.

Watch the following video and observe how thermite completely melts a car engine in a matter of seconds, without the addition of sulphur, and also completely resists neutralization by liquid nitrogen. Notice how the dripping substance is identical to that seen in the south tower video.

The following video highlights the fact that steaming hot molten metal was still being found at the World Trade Center site six weeks after the attack.

Jones also, "cited video pictures showing white ash rising from the south tower near the dripping, liquefied metal. When thermite burns, Jones said, it releases aluminum-oxide ash. The presence of both yellow-white molten iron and aluminum oxide ash "are signature characteristics of a thermite reaction," he said."

American Free Press writer Christopher Bollyn discusses evidence of thermite used to sever the twin tower's steel support columns in the picture below.

"In this photo, for example, the column directly above the fireman's helmet shows that it was cut with thermite. There is a substantial amount of hardened molten iron which can be seen on both the inside and outside of the box column. This is precisely what one would expect to find on a column which had been cut with thermite," says Bollyn.

White flames consistent with how thermite reacts producing molten iron and aluminum oxide are also visible in this photograph at the corner of the 81st floor of the south tower.

The USGS Spectroscopy Lab produced images which showed dense thermal hot spots days and weeks after the attacks. ABC News reported that, "the temperature at the core of "the pile," is near 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, according to fire officials, who add that the fires are too deep for firefighters to get to."

The public release of Professor Jones' scientific analysis is imminent - watch this space for the story as soon as it breaks.

ADDENDUM (2006)

International Terrorism Does Not Exist

By General Leonid Ivashov
January 22 2006

ADDENDUM 24 September 2006

Greetings Mr. White,

I felt it necessary to follow up to a recent story that
was published in Cincinnati Post. It was the 1 in 3 believe 9-11
See the Article --- Email Editors @ Cincy Post --- Proof of Lauro's Military Record
conspiracy theory. I must admit that at first I was overwhelmed with
joy that our local paper was actually starting to have real journalism
and talk about real issues. Then I read the story and it was a total
debunk to make the actual people around the world who feel there was
something not right about 9-11, to look like over reacting
conspiracy theorists.

Im utterly outraged. My 9 year old daughter could have done more
research in this, as opposed to just trying to throw the publics ideas
and feelings out. Is this not what journalism is supposed to represent
- real issues? There have been many, many polls done in major cities
that actually ask people how they felt about the 9-11 tragedy. One
such poll is called the Zogby poll; which was offered in New York City.

Honestly I could care less what is done with this letter, but I feel
that I should speak my mind and Ill tell you some things that I have
not told many people at all. From 1995 till 2002 I was a Sergeant in
the United States Army. Not only this, but I was stationed at United
States Central Command, which is located at MacDill AFB in Tampa
Florida. I was on active duty when 9-11 happened. In the days prior to
the tragedies, we were involved in many exercises. Some of these
exercises included the scenarios of hijacked planes crashing into, our
building the world trade center, the White House, Sears Tower, and the
Pentagon. These drills or exercises as we called them, where
classified Top Secret. Having a Top Secret rated clearance I was
dumbfounded that they would ever push a training exercise above the
level of Secret. Over my 8 years in the Army, I had participated in
many exercises around the world, none of which were ever classified
over the Secret level.

Ill start by saying a few months prior it was announced by President
Bush that Dick Cheney would be heading up operations over NORAD our
North American Aerospace Defense Command. Along with many of my peers,
we were shocked. Over the years, if you research NORAD, it has always
been under the command of a Military officer. It was done this way
because the defense of this country has always been in the hands of
such. Prior to the months before 9-11 this was all of the sudden
changed. Like I said, if you research NORAD and the command structure
you will find that it was imposed long ago that the military should be
in control of the order to scramble planes in the defense of American
air space. For some strange reason, Bush changed this and gave that
power to a civilian person on his Staff team yes I know, very
interesting.

Back to the morning of 9-11; the command was busy with this training
exercise. We were instructed to bring all our gear in to prep for a
mock (staged) deployment to the Middle East. On the morning of 9-11 I
had been on base prepped and ready to go since about 0400am. During my
time at the base that morning, they were setting up barriers around
the command and placing gun posts on the roofs. When I questioned one
of the security officers about the machine gun and shoulder fired
rockets on the roof I was given the answer its a precaution for a
plane attempting to crash into this building.

So, I was standing in the SCIF (Secure Compartmented Information
Facility), which is basically this underground bunker command post for
USCENTCOM, when the first plane hit. We were watching the fly patterns
of all the planes on the aerospace grid. This contained not only all
commercial flights at the time, but all military flights, and fake
enemy planes that were supposedly put on there for the exercise. Many
of the planes sent to intercept the fake blips were scrambled from
Andrews which is an air defense AFB for the East Coast. They were sent
across the US and left very few planes to defend the capital. After
the first plane hit the tower we were all in disbelief. After the
initial shock was over, our questions were what are the odds this
could happen for real, during a training exercise thats covering the
same scenario? We were all at wits end. Then to top all of this off,
Cheney gave NORAD the order to stand down scrambling jets to
intercept. A few moments later tower 2 was hit. Only after the
Pentagon was hit, did he give the orders to scramble the jets to
intercept the plane bound for the White House.

All of this is very interesting to me it sickened me so that I left
the Army after coming back from an 8 month deployment to Afghanistan.
There were just too many questions that no one could answer, too many
things that did not make sense. How is it possible to have a training
exercise about planes hitting the WTC and then actually have planes
hit the WTC? This kind of thing just does not happen unless its
pre-planned. What reason would there be to have this type of exercise
on that morning, Ill tell you if you are placing fake planes all
over the north American aerospace grid then you have no way of
knowing which planes are real and which are fake. Then to thicken the
plot you put a civilian in charge of NORAD so that the military does
not have the power to initiate the order for jets to be scrambled to
intercept. If the military would have still commanded power over NORAD
they would have scrambled jets because they would have simply
followed the procedures that had been in place for this type of
situation for years and years and scrambled jets.

To delve even further, as Im standing there watching the towers
collapse, next to me is one of my good friends and a former commander
of the Army Corps of Engineers. He is a demolitions expert. He was
even more surprised than me. When the towers collapsed he kept saying
this isnt right, this isnt right. When I asked him what he was
talking about he told me that steel buildings dont fall down that
way. Even if they are struck by objects; he went on to say that in
theory if the top 10 floors were hit, then possibly just that part of
the building would fall over and off, but the rest would remain
standing. When I asked him, not understanding the implications of
demolitions, he told me that it looked as if they were brought down by
controlled demolitions. I was utterly amazed, but after he said that
it did sort of appear that way.

Ill tell you what gave this whole thing away was building 7. If
they would not have brought this building down, then they probably
could have gotten away with it all. It was the most amazing site I
have ever seen. Not only was it amazing, it bore reality to the truth
of the situation something was not right here. Now, Im going to
tell you all I have learned, but I urge anyone to just spend 1hr
reading about this incident on the internet and learning the facts.
There have been numerous scholars, numerous physicists that have
analyzed this over and over and over again. And they all come to the
same conclusion, something does not add up. Building 7 was never
directly hit by a plane. Now it was stated that a piece of one of the
towers fell onto the side of building 7 and caught one of the floors
on fire. A few moments later we all witnessed the most perfect example
of controlled demolitions to ever be caught on camera. It could not be
proved that building 7 fell due to fire. My friend and I standing
there in the SCIF watching in uninterruptible awe with all those other
military members; watching building 7 fall perfectly onto its
footprint; my friend stating that it was beautifully done.

We all knew then we all realized that this was not some group of
unorganized cave dwellers from Afghanistan orchestrating a perfect hit
on American soil. It was impossible. Shortly after the Pentagon was
struck I called my close friend that I went to Basic Training with.
All civilian lines were down and I had to contact him via STU which is
a black line classified phone system. He did not answer, but one of
his soldiers did. I asked if SGT Worthington was ok and he said yes. I
asked if the plane did severe damage and he told me I didnt see any
plane. Then when I finally got to speak to my friend, he started
acting strange saying he could not talk about the incident over this
line. He was shipped off overseas a few weeks later and I never to
this day have had the chance to speak with him.

The Pentagon crash tape was released a few months back after 5 years.
You need to watch that tape no where can you see a plane strike the
Pentagon. This is because it was not a plane. I cannot tell you
exactly what hit the Pentagon, but its unanimous; it was definitely
not a plane. I can assure you that there is more than one CCTV camera
around the Pentagon. On September 25, 4 days before my 25th birthday,
I deployed to Afghanistan. Over the 8months I was there I had never
seen one intelligent Afghani soldier. They were all tattered and
scrawny and could barely shoot their weapons straight. This does not
mean that there were not men that could fly a plane, but after what I
saw it was extremely hard to believe they could be taught to fly a
sophisticated piece of aeronautical equipment.

My point Mr. Editor is that I spent 8 months in combat watching my
brothers die in the name of Freedom. I killed, in the name of Freedom
and to this day my brothers are still being killed for this
illusionary war we call the War on Terror. Where the enemy has no face
where there is no clear objective. In this War, anyone with ill
thoughts toward this country can be defined as a terrorist. Well, I
guess that includes me in this group as well as everyone else who
questions the events of 911, because we all hold ill thoughts toward
the leadership of this country and I say the real terrorists in this
world sit right in the heart of its capital.

I have bled for this country and would do so again in a heart beat
but only to protect its people, the true Americans that live here. I
would never again offer my life under the leadership whose real goal
is oil and money. The same ones who staged the most perfect
illusionary tactic in our history that was a pretext to a war on
terror that would never again go away. Their goal was to scare the
American public into submission making it easier for the world powers
to do their evil and get away with it.

Now that may sound like a typical conspiracy theorist I guess, but how
many do you actually talk to? Im not here saying that Aliens came
down and used laser beams to bring the towers down or control the
planes that were flown; Im telling you as a sane, logical and
intelligent individual, something does not add up about this. Earlier
this year I was watching the Discovery channel. They have a PBS
program called Rebuilding America. This particular episode was about
the WTC building 7. They interviewed Larry Silverstein (the owner)
about building 7. He stated on national TV the following which is the
direct quote and can be found here: http://www.wtc7.net/pullit.html

I remember getting a call from the, ER, fire department commander,
telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain
the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the
smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull
and we watched the building collapse.

I actually have the program recorded and you are more than welcome to
come by my house and watch it. He actually stated this on national TV.
I was so amazed that I almost shat myself. I could not believe he
actually stated this on a nationally broadcasted TV program. You can
ask any person who has done controlled demolitions please interview
someone they will tell you it takes weeks of planning to do this. We
are expected to believe that this was facilitated and planned in a
matter of hours for building 7, while the damn thing was on fire you
have got to be kidding me. If that is not enough to make you believe
something was fishy well then nothing will ever do.

Since that time there have been numerous scholars, some of which have
actually been publicly broadcasted on CSPAN. The latest program was
called: Theories about 9-11. American Perspectives and you can watch
this (which I advise you do) per this link: Theories about 9-11
(American Perspectives) or you can go to www.c-span.org and look under
their video/audio section to find this title. Its an outstanding
video and encompasses the thoughts of not only the American public,
but also Dr Steven Jones from Brigham Young University a physics
professor that actually received a piece of the rubble from the WTC.
Not only does he profoundly agree that building 7 was a controlled
demolition he can prove it. After he analyzed the piece of debris
they found; there were large traces of sulfur and Thermite found. If
you did not know, Thermite is a chemical compound found in many
explosives including C4 which I have used many times in the Army. It
leaves a distinct smell and identifiable residue upon explosion. Dr
Jones found large traces of this from the rubble.

Sir, there are many things that I never wanted to know for one that
the government that is supposed to be caring for the American people
could be corrupt. This was the last thing that I ever wanted to be
true but its time we wake up and smell the bullshit because its
permeating throughout the American public and we are all starting to
realize whats really going on. If your news station actually did a
similar Zogby type poll here in Cincinnati, I think you would find
that a lot more than 1/3 of the people believe this. I know tons just
in this area.

I could literally write you 100 pages of truths that could prove that
9-11 was an inside job, but Id probably just be passed off as some
crazy conspiracy theorist. Instead I want to give you the tools to
look for yourself because the quest for wisdom is a journey we must
all take alone. So, to you I add the following links and if you just
spend a small portion of your day reading and watching some of this
footage, who knows you may wake up and stand along side the rest of us
in utter amazement.


Respectfully,

SGT Lauro Chavez
United States Central Command

ADDENDUM (24 September 2006)

ADDENDUM (24 September 2006)

ADDENDUM (24 September 2006)

ADDENDUM 2 October 2006

Bush Junta Complicity in 9/11

 

 

     Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, a longtime Army intelligence officer, publicly claimed on August 15, 2005 that the 9/11 committee investigation was a cover-up. "Shaffer said that his unit had contacted the FBI repeatedly during 2000 to warn that a US-based terrorist cell was at work, but three times was forced to cancel meetings to brief the FBI at the instruction of the Strategic Operations Command (SOCOM), the Pentagon unit in charge of all counter-terrorism work."

"There is only one politically serious explanation of this now-indisputable fact: powerful forces within the US military/intelligence complex wanted a terrorist incident on US soil in order to create the needed shift in public opinion required to embark on a long-planned campaign of military intervention in Central Asia and the Middle East. Whether or not they knew the scale of the impending attacks and what the precise targets would be, they acted in such a way as to block the arrest of known terrorist operatives and allow them to carry out their plot." ¹

     On August 9, 2005, a front page article in the New York Times revealed that a military intelligence unit had identified four September 11 hijackers as Al Qaeda operatives working in the US a year before the 9/11 attacks.A former intelligence officer in the Pentagon unit named Able Danger indicated that the intelligence unit was prevented by the military�s Special Operations Command from passing on the information to the FBI.

"Why was this information concealed?

"Because it points imperiously to the existence of a conspiracy within one or another intelligence or security agency, not to mention the Bush White House, to shield the future hijackers and allow some form of terrorist attack on US soil to occur. All of the efforts of the 9/11 commission�as well as the entire official media and both the Democratic and Republican parties�have been concentrated on excluding even the possibility that something more sinister than bureaucratic incompetence or institutional roadblocks were responsible for an intelligence failure of staggering dimensions.

"But the evidence pointing to some form of government complicity continues to mount, despite official whitewashes, cover-ups, half-truths and lies." ²

 

"A report released June 9, 2005 by the FBI�s Office of the Inspector General raises new questions about the role of the US government in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The internal FBI study provides several important revelations about how US intelligence agencies ignored and even suppressed warnings in the period leading up to the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon that killed nearly 3,000 people." ³

June 13, 2005: "A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11. Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is 'bogus' and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7. Reynolds, who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas and is now professor emeritus at Texas A&M University said, 'If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling.' Reynolds commented from his Texas A&M office, 'It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings.'" ⁴

     Gore Vidal's essay 'The Enemy Within' was published on October 27, 2002 in the print edition of The Observer. In it Vidal claims that what he calls a "Bush junta" planned and carried out the terrorist attacks as a pretext to enact a pre-existing agenda to invade Afghanistan and attack civil liberties in the U.S.

 

"We still don't know by whom we were struck that infamous Tuesday, or for what true purpose. But it is fairly plain to many civil libertarians that 9/11 put paid not only to much of our fragile Bill of Rights but also to our once-envied system of government which had taken a mortal blow the previous year when the Supreme Court did a little dance in 5/4 time and replaced a popularly elected President with the oil and gas Bush-Cheney junta."

 

     Internet radio and print columnist Alex Jones of Infowar.com now states without equivocation:

 

"My friends, the government just didn't have prior knowledge of the September 11th al Qaeda attacks. They actually funded, trained, protected, coddled, and shepherded al Qaeda into this country. Trained many of the terrorists at Pensacola Naval Air Station, U.S.A., threatened F.B.I. and defense intelligence officers who tried to stop al Qaeda, threatened them with arrest. Bush signed now public document W199I two months before September 11, threatening them with arrest if they tried to stop al Qaeda."

     Before you dismiss Jones as a "conspiracy nut," you may want to view his video, The Road to Tyranny, available online.   You may be surprised at how much documented evidence for his conclusion Jones is able to assemble.

     A number of level-headed people, including former Bush counter-terrorism coordinator Richard Clarke, are now seriously asking if the Bush administration did all it could have to prevent the 9/11 tragedy. The 9/11 Commission was a ploy to protect the Bush Junta from the people. The Commission struggled against great obstacles put up primarily by the Bush administration, then issued a report that was a total coverup. In the early part of April, 2004, at least one poll showed that 70% of Americans believed Bush knew of 9/11 in advance. A June, 2005 MSNBC poll found that 94% of Americans believe Bush misled the nation in order to go to war with Iraq.


 

You Can't Bury Your Head in the Sand

     But even if you don't think that there's enough evidence to conclude that 9/11 was a Bush conspiracy, you need to:

 

• review and  face  all the facts

   

• consider carefully all the relevant hypotheses

   

• select that hypothesis which has the preponderance of evidence to support it

     In regard to 9/11, there are two main hypotheses, with sub-hypotheses branching out from them:

 

• the Bush administration was complicit in the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon

   

• the Bush administration was not complicit in the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon
   

     The Bush administration, the rabid right, and even some reputedly left-leaning liberals are warning us that any serious consideration of the hypothesis that 9/11 was a Bush conspiracy is a flight into lunacy.

     In an extraordinarily insightful essay, Bev Conover, Online Journal Editor and Publisher, asks the absolutely essential question:
 

Has the Establishment Left become a Handmaiden of the Republican Right?

 

"Gangway for the self-appointed gatekeepers of the left who are on a crusade to spin, smear, attack, and label as loony anyone who won't accept the official line that the events leading up to and surrounding September 11 are nothing more than a series of coincidences and intelligence failures."

     What Ms. Conover calls a "cabal of lily-livered leftists, ensconced in their ivory towers," includes such supposed "stars" as Norman Solomon, executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy; David Corn, The Nation's Washington editor; Michael Albert, co-founder of Z Magazine and system operator of the magazine's Znet.org; Steve Rendall, FAIR's senior analyst; Chip Berlet, senior research analyst for Political Research Associates; Larry Bensky of Pacifica Radio's flagship station, KPFA; and Noam Chomsky, writer, philosopher, and professor of linguistics at MIT.

     As Conover points out, the dread list of "conspiracy nuts" includes not only such usual suspects as Mike Ruppert of CopVCia website notoriety, but also the newest "arch conspiracist," Georgia Representative Cynthia McKinney, who had the temerity to call for an investigation into what the Bush administration knew before the attacks and the connection of Bush and the Carlyle Group, one of the largest corporations which is profiting handsomely from the "war on terrorism."

     Ms. Conover ends her thoughtful essay with a salient question:

 

"So how do we explain this behavior of the lily-livered left? If the Ivory Tower gentlemen are leaving it to us in the trenches to get to the truth, because they won't dirty their hands to help us collect the bits and pieces to connect the dots, why then are they so ferociously attacking our efforts? Are they currying favor with someone? Is it time for us to start following the money?"

     Yes, indeed it's time we started following the money to explain the gutlessness of the establishment "liberals" and also to follow the money in the entire 9/11 phenomenon to see who profits from this catastrophe and how.

 

Self-Informed Citizens Want to Know

     If you're going to make sense of the World Trade Center/Pentagon catastrophe, you're going to have to dare to think the "unthinkable."

     Certainly the Demonic Cabal which has been the controlling power behind both Democratic and Republican administrations since the beginning of the twentieth century, has no trouble thinking and carrying out the unthinkable:

 

• forcing America into the Gulf War, the Afghanistan War, and now the Iraq War to protect corporate oil interests, resulting in American soldiers being killed along with an uncounted number of enemy civilians

   

• creating a plan, approved by all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, titled "Operation Northwoods:"

a military operation involving the murder of American civilians as a way to create a pretext for a military operation against Cuba

 

the plan included assassinations and bombs in American cities, blowing up American ships in Cuban harbors, hijacking American airplanes

 

according to "Operation Northwoods" "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation"

 

the current Bush administration creating plans for nuclear first strike military actions

      None of us likes to think that our own government would deliberately carry out a murderous attack on its own people. But that hypothesis has to be given equal weight with the theory that the Bush administration was not complicit in 9/11. The Downing Street memo and related material now clearly show that Bush and Blair deliberately lied to their people to initiate the pre-emptive Iraq war.

     We need to consider all relevant sub-hypotheses in coming to an informed opinion:
 

1. the Bush administration was complicit in the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon

    

   • this is part of a larger conspiracy to change the face of government in the U.S.

      

   • the 9/11 attack was a (CIA, FBI, military, ???) operation gone wrong

 

"One thing is certain: without the tragedy of 9/11, the government could not possibly have shifted public opinion to tolerate invasions in the oil-rich regions of Central Asia and the Persian Gulf and an open-ended policy of militarism codified in the doctrine of preventive war. Nor could it have carried out the massive attack on democratic rights that has been justified by appeals to national security and the 'war on terrorism.' "For the Bush administration and the American ruling elite, 9/11 served, and continues to serve, an indispensable political function in facilitating the pursuit of imperialist policy abroad and social reaction at home." 5

2. The second general hypothesis is that the Bush administration was not complicit in the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon

 

• but they did have prior knowledge of possible dangers and chose to do nothing

   

• and they had no prior knowledge of possible danger of terrorist attack

 

You Need to Form a Definite Opinion To Be Able to Act Intelligently

     In the coming months, you're going to have to respond to what the Bush administration does. You can only respond sensibly if you have at least a working hypothesis about what's really going on in the world. Intelligent behavior involves analyzing the problems and issues facing us to find an acceptable theoretical solution which we then test in practice.

     Intelligent, critical thinking involves

 

• reviewing and  facing  all the facts

   

• considering carefully all the relevant hypotheses

   

• selecting that hypothesis which has the preponderance of evidence to support it

     Having outlined the viable, relevant hypotheses, you must now look at all the facts and see which hypothesis is supported with the preponderance of evidence. In trying to figure out the 9/11 phenomenon, you're not going to find many "smoking guns" (though perhaps you will find more than you might suppose at first glance).

      Having decided which hypothesis best fits the facts as you know them, you'll then have a firm foundation for forming your beliefs and selecting how you will respond to events in the future.

     My purpose in this essay has been to provide a framework for thought in trying to make sense of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, not to review the evidence which supports or disproves the hypotheses and sub-hypotheses, since that has been done in a previous article.

     My personal opinion is that, with the evidence now available to us, the hypothesis with the most foundation is that the demonic cabal and its Bush junta puppets planned and carried out the 9/11 horror to make it possible to institute a police state in the United States and continue its efforts toward military and economic world domination.

     I encourage you to dare to think the unthinkable wherever it may take you. Don't let either right-wing reactionaries or pseudo-liberals frighten you from making up your own mind as to just what happened on September 11, 2001.

     It's up to us to consider these questions as if our lives depend on them--because they probably do.

By Norman D. Livergood

First posted: September, 2002--Last updated: 8/11/05


__________

¹ Former intelligence officer proves the Bush junta was complicit in 9/11 and its cover-up

² Joseph Kay and Barry Grey, "Why is the media burying new revelations about 9/11?" World Socialist Web Site, 8/11/05

³ FBI inspector general�s report: more evidence of government complicity in 9/11 attacks

⁴ WTC Collapse Due to Controlled Demolition, an "Inside Job," says Former Bush Advisor

⁵ Joseph Kay and Barry Grey, "Why is the media burying new revelations about 9/11?" World Socialist Web Site, 8/11/05

Updates:

 

8/9/05: New evidence of Bush junta complcity in 9/11   6/14/05: 9/11 Oddities--many links   4/12/04: Former FBI translator says Bush administration knew of attacks with aircraft   4/12/04: The Bush 9/11 Scandal for Dummies   4/12/04: Was the Bush Administration Complicit in 9/11?   4/12/04: 9/11 Attack Information   4/12/024: 9/11 Attack Information

4/12/04: Bush Administration is the major roadblock for the 9-11 Commission   4/12/04: 9/11 Attack Information (of all sorts)   10/27/02: Gore Vidal claims 'Bush junta' complicit in 9/11   7/19/02: The Enemy Is Inside The Gates   A Useful Hypothesis in Ferreting out Reality

 

 

 

 

Return to Table of Contents Page