Allisone Heartsong
© 30 June 2006 In God We Trust

In 1931, Dr. Otto Warburg was awarded the Nobel Prize for his pioneering discovery of the oxygen-transferring enzyme which constitutes the basis for healthy cellular respiration.

Thirty-five years later, on 30 June 1966, during the course of delivering what has become known as his Lindau Lecture to Nobel Laureates, Dr. Warburg made the following historic announcement: “The prime cause of cancer is the replacement of ... oxidation of sugar in normal body cells by fermentation of sugar ... Nobody today can say that one does not know what the prime cause of cancer is. On the contrary, there is no disease whose prime cause is better known, so that today ignorance is no longer an excuse for avoiding measures for prevention. But how long prevention will be avoided depends on how long the prophets of agnosticism will succeed in inhibiting the application of scientific knowledge in the cancer field. In the meantime, millions of men and women must die of cancer unnecessarily.”

The clear implication of these extraordinary words is that, even though the cause of cancer was clearly understood by 1966, Dr. Warburg had come to realize by this time that the Dark Illuminati (whom he referred to as “the prophets of agnosticism”) were doing everything in their power to prevent this knowledge from being used to liberate humanity from the scourge of cancer.

Thanks to the heroic efforts of Otto Warburg and despite the malevolent efforts of the Dark Illuminati, we now know that the essential cause of cancer is the impairment of cellular respiration, either by an acidic diet of enzyme-deficient cooked food or by the ingestion of carcinogens, which has the effect of replacing healthy cellular oxidation with malignant cellular fermentation that results in acidic toxicity.

Let it be clearly understood therefore that, contrary to the disinformation which has been promulgated by the Dark Illuminati, who constitute the psychopathic core of the global elite, cancer is not caused by a virus or by ultraviolet sunlight.

It is the acidic shift from oxidation to fermentation on a cellular level which causes cancer by destroying the ability of the DNA and RNA to control cell division.

Once we understand this, we are then in a position to realize that overacidification is the primary cause underlying every physical illness.

The key thing to remember is that whereas raw greens, raw vegetables, raw low-sugar fruits, raw almonds, raw sprouted seeds, raw ground cinnamon, and raw ground cayenne pepper have an alkaline pH which is healthy, almost all other foods, including cooked foods, have an acidic pH which is potentially unhealthy, the fundamental rule of nutrition being that a healthy diet must be at least 80 percent alkaline in order to maintain a healthy cellular pH above 7 on a scale of 1 to 14, where everything below 7 is acidic and everything above 7 is alkaline.

The easiest way to monitor your cellular pH is to measure your urine pH by means of commercially available litmus tape, since urine pH is a reflection of cellular pH.

When the cellular pH of the body becomes acidic, a variety of disease symptoms begin to manifest because the body is then forced to neutralize this acidic condition by using up its alkaline reserves (of calcium, magnesium, potassium, zinc, and sodium, which are stored in the bones, teeth, muscles, and ligaments) in order to maintain a slightly alkaline blood pH of around 7.37, which is absolutely essential for the maintenance of life.

From this it follows that the basic prerequisite for a healthy immune system is an alkaline cellular pH.

Let it also be understood that, contrary to the disinformation which has been promulgated by the psychopathic core of the global elite (who have malevolently promoted Pasteur’s fallacious germ theory of disease rather than Bechamp’s validated acidic theory of disease), bacteria do not initiate disease, but may become pathogenic under acidic conditions.

Thus, in accordance with the fundamental rule of nutrition, a healthy body also requires that the bacteria in the intestines be at least 80 percent healthy aerobic bacteria and not more than 20 percent potentially unhealthy anaerobic bacteria. As a matter of fact, many health practitioners are of the opinion that a predominance of more than 20 percent anaerobic bacteria in the intestines constitutes the common denominator underlying every form of disease.

The reason for this is that anaerobic bacteria thrive in an acidic environment and produce acidic wastes which compound the acidic condition, thereby resulting in the acidic toxicity that gives rise to a wide variety of disease symptoms.

Early warning signs of acidic toxicity include sugar cravings, fatigue, colds, allergies, fungal conditions, and obesity, which is caused by the body’s attempt to defend itself against acidity by storing acid in fat cells.


There is no Disease

by Robert O. Young

Disease names like diabetes and osteoporosis are misleading and
misinform patients about disease prevention.

There is a curious tendency in conventional medicine to name a
set of symptoms a disease. I was recently at a compounding
pharmacy having my bone mineral density measured to update
my health stats. I spotted a poster touting a new drug for
osteoporosis. It was written by a drug company and it said exactly
this: 'Osteoporosis is a disease that causes weak and fragile bones.'
Then, the poster went on to say that you need a particular drug to
counteract this 'disease.'

Yet the language is all backwards. Osteoporosis isn't a disease that
causes weak bones, osteoporosis is the name given to a diagnosis
of weak bones. In other words, the weak bones are the result of
excess acidity, and then the diagnosis of osteoporosis followed.
The drug poster makes it sound like osteoporosis strikes first, and
then you get weak bones. The cause and effect is all backwards. And
that's how drug companies want people to think about diseases and
symptoms: first you 'get' the disease, and then you are 'diagnosed'
just in time to take a new drug for the rest of your life.

But it's all hogwash. There is no such disease as osteoporosis. It's just
a made-up name given to a pattern of symptoms that indicate you are
over-acid which causes your bones to get fragile.

As another example, when a person follows an unhealthy lifestyle that
results in a symptom such as high blood pressure, that symptom is
actually being assumed to be a disease all by itself and it will be given
a disease name. What disease? The disease is, of course, 'high blood
pressure.' Doctors throw this phrase around as if it were an actual
disease and not merely descriptive of patient physiology.

This may all seem silly, right? But there's actually a very important
point to all this.

When we look at symptoms and give them disease names, we
automatically distort the selection of available treatments for such
a disease. If the disease is, by itself, high cholesterol, then the cure
for the disease must be nothing other than lowering the high
cholesterol. And that's how we end up with all these
pharmaceuticals treating high cholesterol in order to 'prevent' this
disease and lower the levels of LDL cholesterol in the human patient.
By lowering only the cholesterol, the doctor can rest assured that
he is, in fact, treating this 'disease,' since the definition of this
'disease' is high cholesterol and nothing else.

But there is a fatal flaw in this approach to disease treatment: the
symptom is not the cause of the disease. There is another cause,
and this deeper cause is routinely ignored by conventional medicine,
doctors, drug companies, and even patients.

Let's take a closer look at high blood pressure. What actually
causes high blood pressure? Many doctors would say high blood
pressure is caused by a specific, measurable interaction between
circulating chemicals in the human body. Thus, the ill-behaved
chemical compounds are the cause of the high blood pressure,
and therefore the solution is to regulate these chemicals. That's
exactly what pharmaceuticals do -- they attempt to manipulate
the chemicals in the body to adjust the symptoms of high blood
pressure. Thus, they only treat the symptoms, not the root cause.

Or take a look at high cholesterol. The conventional medicine
approach says that high cholesterol is caused by a chemical
imbalance in the liver, which is the organ that produces cholesterol.
Thus the treatment for high cholesterol is a prescription drug that
inhibits the liver's production of cholesterol (statin drugs). Upon
taking these drugs, the high cholesterol (the 'disease') is regulated,
but what was causing the liver to overproduce cholesterol in the
first place? That causative factor remains ignored.
The root cause of high cholesterol, as it turns out, is primarily
an over acidic diet. A person who eats foods that are acidic will
inevitably cause the body to go into preservation mode and
produce more cholesterol to neutralize the excess acid thus
showing the symptoms of this so-called disease of high cholesterol.
Its simple cause and effect. Eat the wrong foods, and you'll
produce too much acid which will cause the body to release
cholesterol from the liver to bind up that acid which can be
detected and diagnosed by conventional medical procedures.  

You see it is not the cholesterol that is bad it is the acid producing
food we eat that is bad.  Reduce the acid producing foods like beef,
chicken, pork, dairy, coffee, tea, soda pops, etc and you will reduce
the protective cholesterol that is saving your life from excess acid

Yet the root cause of all this is actually poor food choice, not some
bizarre behavior by the liver. If the disease were to be accurately
named, then, it would be called Acidic Food Choice Disease, or
simply AFCD.

AFCD would be a far more accurate name that would make sense
to people. If it's an acidic foods choice disease, then it seems that
the obvious solution to the disease would be to choose foods that
aren't so acidic. Of course that may be a bit of simplification since
you have to distinguish between healthy alkaline foods and unhealthy
acidic foods. But at least the name AFCD gives patients a better idea
of what's actually going on rather than naming the disease after a
symptom, such as high cholesterol. You see, the symptom is not the
disease, but conventional medicine insists on calling the symptom
the disease because that way it can treat the symptom and claim
success without actually addressing the underlying cause, which
remains a mystery to modern medicine.

But let's move on to some other diseases so you get a clearer
picture of how this actually works. Another disease that's caused
by poor acidic food choice is diabetes. Type 2 diabetes is the
natural physiological and metabolic result of a person consuming
refined carbohydrates and added sugars in large quantities,
undigested proteins from beef, chicken, and pork without
engaging in regular physical exercise that would compensate
for such dietary practices.
The name 'diabetes' is meaningless to the average person. The
disease should be called Excessive Acid Disease, or EAD. If it
were called Excessive Acid Disease, the solution to it would be
rather apparent; simply eat less sugar, eliminate all animal
proteins, eggs, dairy, drink fewer soft drinks and so on. But of
course that would be far too simple for the medical community,
so the disease must be given a complex name such as diabetes
that puts its solution out of reach of the average patient.

Another disease that is named after its symptom is cancer. In
fact, to this day, most doctors and many patients still believe
that cancer is a physical thing: a tumor. In reality, a tumor is
the solution of cancer, not its cause. A tumor is simply a
physical manifestation of bound up acidic cells so they do not
spoil other healthy cells. The tumor is the solution to cells
damaged by acids not the problem.  The truth is cancer is not a
cell but an acidic liquid.  When a person 'has cancer,' what they
really have is a latent tissue acidosis. They are absorbing their
own acidic urine. It that would be a far better name for the disease:
Latent Tissue Acidosis or LTA.

If cancer were actually called Latent Tissue Acidosis, it would seem
ridiculous to try to cure cancer by cutting out tumors through surgery
and by destroying the immune system with chemotherapy. And yet
these are precisely the most popular treatments for cancer offered
by conventional medicine. These treatments do absolutely nothing
to support the patient's immune system and prevent the build up of
acids in the tissues. That's exactly why most people who undergo
chemotherapy or the removal of tumors through surgical
procedures end up with yet more cancer a few months or a few
years later. It's also another reason why survival rates of cancer
have barely budged over the last twenty years. (In other words,
conventional medicine's treatments for cancer simply don't work.)

The main reason is current medical science wrongly perceives cancer
as a cell when in reality cancer is an acidic liquid, like lactic acid.
This whole situation stems from the fact that the disease is
misnamed. It isn't cancer, it isn't a tumor and it certainly isn't a
disease caused by having too strong of an immune system that
needs to be destroyed through chemotherapy. It is simply latent
tissue acidosis. And if it were called latent tissue acidosis disease
or urine in the tissues, the effective treatment for cancer would be

There are many other diseases that are given misleading names
by western medicine. But if you look around the world and take a
look at how diseases are named elsewhere, you will find many
countries have disease names that actually make sense.

For example, in Chinese medicine, Alzheimer's disease is given
a name that means, when translated, 'feeble mind disease.' In
Chinese medicine, the name of the disease more accurately
describes the actual cause of the disease which is caused by
acids or urine on the brain, whereas in western medicine, the
name of the disease seems to be intended to obscure the root
cause of the disease, thereby making all diseases sound far
more complex and mysterious than they really are.

This is one way in which doctors and practitioners of western
medicine keep medical treatments out of the reach of the average
citizen. Because, by God, they sure don't want people thinking for
themselves about the causes of disease!

By creating a whole new vocabulary for medical conditions, they
can speak their own secret language and make sure that people
who aren't schooled in medicine don't understand what they're

That's a shame, because the treatments and cures for virtually all
chronic diseases are actually quite simple and can be described in
plain language, such as making different alkaline food choices,
getting more natural sunlight, drinking more alkaline water,
engaging in regular physical exercise, avoiding specific acidic
foods, supplementing your diet with green foods and green
drinks and alkalizing nutritional supplements and so on.

See, western medicine prefers to describe diseases in terms of
chemistry. When you're depressed, you aren't suffering from a
lack of natural sunlight; you are suffering from a 'brain chemistry
imbalance' that can only be regulated, they claim, by ingesting toxic
chemicals to alter your brain chemistry. When your bones are brittle,
it's not acidic brittle bones disease; it's called osteoporosis,
something that sounds very technical and complicated. And to treat
it, western doctors and physicians will give you prescriptions for
expensive drugs that somehow claim to make your bones less brittle.
But in fact, the real treatment for this can be described in plain
language once again: regular physical exercise, vitamin D
supplementation, mineral supplements that include calcium and
strontium, natural sunlight, and avoidance of acidic foods such as
soft drinks, white flour and added sugars.

In fact, virtually every disease that's prominent in modern society
-- diabetes, cancer, heart disease, osteoporosis, clinical depression,
irritable bowel syndrome and so on -- can be easily described in
plain language without using complex terms at all. These diseases
are simply misnamed. And I believe that they are intentionally
misnamed to put the jargon out of reach of everyday citizens.
As a result, there's a great deal of arrogance in the language of
western medicine, and this arrogance furthers the language of
separation. Separation never results in healing. In order to effect
healing, we must bring together the language of healers and
patients using plain language that real people understand and that
real people can act upon.

We need to start describing diseases in terms of their root causes,
not in terms of their arcane, biochemical actions. When someone
suffers from seasonal affective disorder or clinical depression,
for example, let's call it what it is: Sunlight Deficiency Disorder.
To treat it, the person simply needs to get more sunlight. This
isn't rocket science, it's not complex, and it doesn't require a

If someone is suffering from osteoporosis, let's get realistic about
the words we use to describe the condition: it's really Acidic Bones
Disease. And it should be treated with things that will enhance
bone density, such as nutrition, physical exercise and avoidance
of acidic foods and drinks that strip away bone mass from the
human body to neutralize the excess acids in the blood and tissues.

All of this information, of course, is rather shocking to old-school
doctors and practitioners of western medicine, and the bigger their
egos are, the more they hate the idea of naming diseases in plain
language that patients can actually comprehend. That's because if
the simple truths about diseases and their causes were known,
health would be more readily available to everyday people, and
that would lessen the importance of physicians and medical

There's a great deal of ego invested in the medical community,
and they sure don't want to make sound health attainable to the
average person without their expert advice. Doctors all want to
serve as the translators of 'truth' and will balk at any attempts
to educate the public to either practice medicine on their own.
But in reality, health (and a connection with spirit) is attainable
by every single person. Health is easy, it is straightforward, it is
direct and, for the most part, it is available free of charge.

A personal connection with our Creator is the same if we ask
humbly in prayer for a relationship with Him, and guidance.
Don't believe the names of diseases given to you by your doctor.
Those names are designed to obscure, not to inform. They are
designed to separate you from self-healing, not to put you in
touch with your own inner healer. And thus, they are nothing
more than bad medicine masquerading as modern medical


.Return to Table of Contents Page